About
Artefacts of Fragmentation is a project designed to provoke contemplation on the ethical challenges
intrinsic to algorithmic curation, highlighting the transition from human curation to digital
algorithms. By engaging with these artefacts of contemplation, viewers are prompted to question their
assumptions, explore alternative perspectives, and cultivate a deeper understanding of the intricate
dynamics shaping digital spaces today.
Context
As personalisation becomes prevalent, curation algorithms introduce dilemmas such as biases, filter bubbles, and the opacity of algorithmic systems, all of which contribute to the fragmentation of society. The project's objective is to confront these issues and stimulate reflection on the profound societal impacts of algorithmic dilemmas through interactive experiences and immersive narratives.
ARTEFACT A
INCLUSIVISION
TouchDesignerPython
TouchDesignerPython
Description
Inclusivision is a software intentionally designed around unethical algorithmic processes. As users interact
with the software, they are confronted with results that highlight the unintended consequences of algorithm
bias on society. This artefact prompts deep reflection on the societal implications of biased algorithms,
challenging users to consider the ethical implications of algorithmic decision-making.
Medium: Software
Format: Thought Experiment
Dilemma: Algorithm Bias
Software Narrative
Inclusivision is designed as a tool to promote inclusivity and incentivise and recognise individuals who
advocate for diverse content. The tool help individuals in analysing and verifying diversity in images
before they are published, allowing users to take control of representation in their content. By doing
so, users actively contribute to promoting inclusive representation.
Upon its launch, Inclusivision’s algorithms are poised to be integrated into major social media
platforms, where they will impact ranking and recommendation processes. Content deemed to have a higher
diversity rating by the algorithm will receive enhanced visibility, securing a more prominent position
in rankings and ensuring broader audience reach.
Thought Experiment
The user test is conducted in the form of a thought experiment, comprising two distinct sessions, each
involving three subjects. Various design considerations were incorporated to ensure that subjects
maintain their suspension of disbelief throughout the process, facilitating full immersion into the
speculative narrative.
The primary objective of the experiment methodology is to effectively measure subjects’ algorithm
literacy levels. Throughout the sessions, subjects engage with the Inclusivision prototype, prompting
critical thinking and ethical contemplation regarding algorithmic processes. Through systematic
observation and analysis of the responses and discussions prompted by the prototype, the experiment
aims to assess algorithm literacy gains across subjects post-experiment.
Measurement Tools
Algorithm literacy is inherently complex to measure due to its multifaceted nature. To address this
challenge, a scale was developed to qualitatively evaluate the experiment subject’s algorithm
literacy levels based on their responses.
The outcomes of the experiment underscore the significance of speculative design in fostering
critical engagement with algorithmic processes and ethical considerations. The findings not only
reflect participants’ heightened awareness of algorithmic biases and societal implications but also
emphasize the effectiveness of discursive design approaches in promoting nuanced discussions.
Biased Outcomes
During the experiment, participants expressed significant concerns regarding the potential for
abuse within Inclusivision's biased algorithmic processes. They raised issues such as the impact
on marginalised groups, the distortion of genuine social media engagement, the spread of
misleading information, and technical vulnerabilities such as manipulation through lighting and
photo editing to influence the software's rating system.
These manipulated outcomes vividly demonstrate the wide-ranging implications of biased algorithmic
processes, highlighting the urgent need for a more equitable and transparent approach to
algorithmic design and implementation. This also calls for fostering more discourse and awareness
around these issues.
ARTEFACT A DOCUMENTATION
ARTEFACT B
CACHE:IDENTITIES
TouchDesignerPython
TouchDesignerPython
Description
Cache:Identities is an interactive installation exploring algorithms' influence on social
identities in the
digital age, emphasizing curated content's impact on individual and collective identities.
Through
visual
narratives on cache data, it reveals how algorithms shape our identities and challenges
algorithmic opacity,
prompting reflection on user autonomy and agency in digital spaces.
Medium: Generative Visuals
Format: Interactive Installation
Dilemma: Algorithm Transparency
Phase 01
To initiate the process, cache data is extracted from each volunteers’ Instagram explore
pages
utilizing
the inspect element function on Google Chrome. Subsequently, the extracted cache data is
methodically
organized into folders, symbolising cache databases.
These folders, each containing 20 randomly selected images, play a crucial role as primary
source
materials for the subsequent phases. The images are also randomly selected, without
previewing
to
retain the integrity of the algorithmic selection process.
Phase 02
Phase 2 of the visual narrative transitions from data collection to uploading cache data to
the cloud. Visually, this phase illustrates the process of transferring the downloaded cache
images to a database for analysis. The interpretive significance lies in demystifying the
backend operations of how algorithms store and classify their personal data.
Phase 2 also fosters transparency in the algorithmic curation data flow, encouraging viewers
to contemplate the digital trajectory of their images and their integration into a larger
system. Through Phase 2, viewers can better understand the connection between individual
experiences and the collective data landscape, fostering deeper reflections on the curation
process.
Phase 03
Phase 3 of the visual narrative aims to visually represent the expansive nature of the data
stored in the cloud. The arrangement of the images and manipulation of the z-axis create an
endless landscape, symbolizing the vastness of the database. Despite utilising a limited
number of images, the goal is to convey the vastness of data, spanning from the inception of
one’s digital presence to the present, all coexisting within the same database.
By presenting the data landscape as endless and boundless, the visuals aim to prompt viewers
to contemplate the sheer volume of information perpetually stored and algorithmically
processed. The intention is to provoke a deep reflection on the extent of digital footprints
and the comprehensive nature of algorithmic curation, encouraging viewers to consider their
online presence within this vast and intricate data landscape.
Phase 04
Phase 4 of the visual narrative introduces dynamic line visuals derived from multi-image
blobtracking technique. These lines intricately connect images, symbolising the complex
relationships formed between data within the algorithmic landscape. The interpretive
significance lies in depicting interconnectedness and the dynamic nature of data processing.
The introduction of movement imparts depth and dimensionality to the algorithmic black box
while suggesting the data’s versatility, enhancing the complexity of the visual narrative.
Phase 05
Phase 5 of the visual narrative encapsulates the journey’s essence, highlighting how cache
data gradually intertwines with and shapes our identities in the digital realm. Through a
series of immersive visuals, viewers are prompted to delve into introspection, contemplating
the profound implications of algorithmic influence on personal identity formation.
By integrating the webcam into this phase, the viewer’s engagement with the experience is
heightened. The inclusion of the webcam serves to create a more interactive and immersive
environment, allowing viewers to directly connect with the narrative unfolding before them.
ARTEFACT B DOCUMENTATION
ARTEFACT
C
FILTER BUBBLE
INCUBATOR
TouchDesignerPython
TouchDesignerPython
Description
Filter Bubble Incubator is a visual exploration revolving around the formation of filter
bubbles.
Drawing
parallels to embryos in an incubator, the project vividly illustrates how content
personalisation
within
these bubbles evolves under distinct conditions, shaped by individual user activity history
and
personal
information. Through this exploration, the project aims to spark reflection on the diverse
perceptions of
truth influenced by algorithmic personalisation.
Medium: Generative Visuals
Format: Visual Installation
Dilemma: Filter Bubbles
Ad Topics
Ads play a crucial role in shaping the personalized content experience that defines a user's
filter bubble, influencing their perceptions and behaviors within their online environment. Meta
Ad Topics, a feature within the Meta platform, empowers users to control the topics of ads they
see, offering insight into the categories of ads targeting them.
Using this data from 12 individuals, the project visually explores the diversity of
content exposure that resulted from personalisation.
Filter Bubbles
Each ad topic is categorized into one of eight groups: lifestyle, business, travel, arts,
culture, fashion, sports, and general interests. I calculated the percentages of ad topics
within each category from an individual's data and used them to create 3D geometric node
bubbles.
These bubbles, representing each category, were then combined to create a visualisation
of the individual's filter bubble.
Content Exposure
The bubbles are positioned over generative text to demonstrate the impact of our filter bubbles on the content we encounter. By combining the bubbles from each individual, I arranged them akin to eggs in an incubator to produce a comprehensive visualisation.
This final display allows viewers to perceive the distinctiveness of our individual filter bubbles and encourages contemplation about the varying perceptions of truth that result.